October 9, 2007
societies, anaemia, scientific, patients, cancer, treatment
No Comments
Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca. Salamanca, Spain.
At present, anaemia in the patients with cancer remains a problem of the first magnitude and of increasing interest due to the high incidence, the major knowledge of its physiopathology, the negative impact on the quality of life of the patient, the influence on the evolution of the disease and its treatments and, finally to the progressive development of new alternatives of treatment, especially the erythropoietic agents. For all this, it becomes necessary to consider the treatment of the anemia of the patients with cancer as a basic part of their support treatment. The erythropoietic agents have demonstrated in the last years that constitute a therapeutic alternative to obtain an increase of the levels of hemoglobin in the patients with anticancer treatments, considering specially that the correction of the anemia not only represents the improvement of an analytical value but also has a significant impact on the quality of life of the patients and diminishes the transfusion requirements. Erythropoietic proteins available for the treatment of the anemia of the patients with cancer are Epoetin-alfa, Epoetin-beta and Darbepoetin-alfa. The existence of different drugs, different doses and intervals of administration, clinical different situations and heterogeneous studies, made necessary the development of documents of consensus and guides of clinical recommendations which provide information on the scientific evidence that supports the use of these agents in medical care. This paper summarizes the main recommendations from panels of experts and scientific societies published so far.
More :
Read the rest…
Share This
October 5, 2007
hormone replacement therapy, patients, breast cancer
No Comments
University Women’s Hospitals of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany endo.meno@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Four prospective randomized studies and at least 15 observational studies investigating hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after breast cancer are available. Only the Hormonal replacement therapy After Breast cancer: Is iT Safe (HABITS) study shows an increased risk of relapse. This is probably associated with the relatively high number of patients with HRT treatment after estrogen receptor-positive cancers as well as to the preferred use of estrogen/progestin combined preparations. As is generally known, the progestin component especially seems to be mainly responsible for the probability of increased diagnosis frequency of breast cancer. However, the patient samples in all studies investigating HRT after breast cancer are small. Therefore, HRT should only be used if alternatives, such as specific not contraindicated phytopreparations or serotonin reuptake inhibitors, are not working. This is primarily due to forensic reasons. According to medical criteria, the data for the alternatives seem to be even more sparse, since many important questions remain unanswered, such as side effects and risks, or also regarding interactions with adjuvant hormone therapy.
PMID: 17912179 [PubMed - in process]
Share This
October 1, 2007
chemoradiotherapy, versus chemotherapy, oesophageal, neoadjuvant, cohort, Comparison, patients, Prospective, cancer
1 Comment
Chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are common neoadjuvant treatments for resectable T3 N0-1 M0 oesophageal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these therapies in consecutive cohorts of patients. METHODS:: Between January 1998 and December 2001, 88 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), prior to 45 Gy in 25 F concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU). From 2002, 117 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (76 patients had two cycles of cisplatin and 41 had four cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU). The primary outcome measure was survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS:: Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 56 per cent (40 patients) and 10 per cent (seven patients) respectively in the chemoradiotherapy group, compared with 47 per cent (46 patients) and 1 per cent (one patient) in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.008). The cumulative 5-year survival rate by intention to treat was 35 per cent after chemoradiotherapy versus 21 per cent after chemotherapy (P = 0.188). The cumulative corrected 5-year survival rate after completed treatment was 44 per cent for chemoradiotherapy compared with 25 per cent for chemotherapy (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION:: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should remain an option for patients with satisfactory performance status. Copyright (c) 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Full Research Data :
New Cancer Research
Store your files secure, online. 2 GB free!

Read the rest…
Share This
September 30, 2007
laryngeal, patients, advanced, treatment
No Comments
Since the original data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group demonstrated that nonsurgical therapy could achieve survival rates comparable to total laryngectomy in selected cases, there has been a progressive increase in employment of nonsurgical therapy for the management of advanced laryngeal cancer. Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conventionally fractionated or hyperfractioned radiotherapy for chemotherapy responders, or simultaneously administered chemoradiation has resulted in a significant number of patients who achieved cure while preserving their larynges. Nevertheless, combined chemotherapy and external beam radiation is associated with a variety of acute and chronic sequelae that can have a debilitating impact on function and quality of life. Although no therapeutic option is without risk, the decision regarding the modality of therapy for a patient with advanced laryngeal cancer should prompt a careful review of the current surgical techniques available for treatment. Data on quality of life and aging, as well as advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, are available today that were not available at the time of the Veterans study. Selection of optimal therapy is often complex and raises the question whether the pendulum may have swung too far in the direction of nonsurgical therapy for advanced laryngeal cancer. This article reviews the current options available for a patient with advanced laryngeal cancer and discusses the impact of therapy. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2007.
Full Research Data :
New Cancer Research
Store your files secure, online. 2 GB free!

Read the rest…
Share This