Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cancer Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 20021. ltv2001@med.cornell.edu

Standard cytotoxic chemotherapy of locally cancer advanced or metastatic breast cancer includes the microtubule-stabilizing taxanes, but like other cytotoxic drugs their effectiveness is compromised by resistance that is either inherent or develops during treatment. Epothilones, which also stabilize microtubules but by a different mechanism, are in clinical development primarily to overcome taxane or multidrug resistance, based on potent preclinical antitumor activity against resistant tumor lines. Ixabepilone is the best-studied epothilone clinically and is active in cancer patients with metastatic breast cancer that has been pretreated with, or had established resistance to, taxanes and/or anthracyclines. In a phase III trial in patients with anthracycline-pretreated or -resistant and taxane-resistant locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, adding ixabepilone to capecitabine significantly improved progression-free survival and the overall response rate compared with capecitabine alone. The primary toxicities associated with ixabepilone treatment are neuropathy and neutropenia, but both are generally manageable. Other epothilones currently in clinical studies are KOS-862, patupilone, ZK-EPO, BMS-310705, and KOS-1584, which have all shown activity in patients with pretreated or resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Share This

The University of breast cancer Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. festeva@mdanderson.org

Despite the recent trend toward treatment of early stage breast cancer aggressively with anthracyclines and taxanes, nearly half of those women will have metastatic recurrence. Moreover, because of the increasing prior exposure to these drugs, far more women facing first-line therapy for recurrent disease will now have developed anthracycline- and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer (ATRMBC), presenting a major therapeutic challenge. A number of established drugs are showing promise in this setting: capecitabine alone or combined with lapatinib; gemcitabine; vinorelbine; and oxaliplatin. At the same time, a variety of new drugs are emerging for potential use in ATRMBC. Among the drugs in clinical development that have shown promising activity include novel classes of compounds (camptothecins and epothilones), newer members of established classes (pemetrexed and vinflunine), and breast cancer agents with novel mechanisms of action (the mitosis inhibitor E7389 and the ascidian-derived anticancer compound trabectedin). Several molecularly targeted agents are also being evaluated in ATRMBC, including interleukin-2 receptor-binding denileukin diftitox, and 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG), which inhibits the protein chaperone heat shock protein 90.

Share This

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan, pullpullachan326@bridge.ocn.ne.jp.

PURPOSE: Advanced prostate cancer, which is one of the most common cancers, usually progresses to hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A recent randomized trial of treatment with docetaxel demonstrated improved survival for patients with HRPC. The combination of docetaxel and estramustine phosphate (estramustine) has been reported to be effective for HRPC. Low-dose estramustine suppresses the pituitary-gonadal axis. Docetaxel plus 5-fluoro-5′-deoxyuridine (5′-dFUrd) had supra-additive cytotoxic effects on HRPC cells consistent with the molecular mechanism. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of adding 5′-dFUrd on the chemotherapy regimen, which consist docetaxel and estramustine. METHODS: All of the HRPC patients were treated with estramustine 140 mg orally twice 5′-dFUrd 200 mg orally four times daily on days 1-21, and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) was administered on day 1. We evaluated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and measurable responses, the progression-free and overall survival, and the impact on adverse effects and the quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Of 34 patients with a median age of 72.3 years, 73% showed PSA responses and 70% showed measurable responses. The median progression-free survival was 18.0 and 5.8 months for PSA responders and non-responders and the overall survival was 19.4 months, respectively. There were few serious adverse effects. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 32.4% of the patients, and was easily managed with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection. There was no significant change in the overall QOL scores serially. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the combined regimen is tolerable and effective in Japanese HRPC patients.

Share This

Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA, tracey.oconnor@roswellpark.org.

PURPOSE: There is a need for chemotherapy regimens active against anthracycline- and taxane-refractory breast cancer. Data from preclinical and pilot studies performed at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) suggested that when irinotecan (IRN) is given with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) efficacy is affected by the sequence of drug administration. Pretreatment with IRN 24 h before 5-FU increased the number of tumor cells in S-phase and the antitumor activity in a preclinical system. These data provided the rationale for the evaluation of IRN and capecitabine, a 5-FU prodrug, sequentially administered in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The main objective of the study was to determine the MTD and identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of capecitabine and IRN. Additionally, the degree of accumulation of cells in S-phase in tumor biopsies obtained at 24 h after the first dose of IRN was measured in consenting patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Metastatic breast cancer patients who experienced disease progression after at least one (taxane or anthracycline based) chemotherapy regimen and an expected survival of at least 3 months and ECOG performance status 0-2 were eligible. Twelve patients were enrolled and treated. The starting doses were IRN 80 mg/m(2) given over 90 min on days 1, 8, 22, 29, and capecitabine 1,500 mg/m(2)/day given days 2-15 and 23-36. Evaluation for response was performed after the first cycle. Sequential tumor biopsies were performed on five patients. RESULTS: The first three patients treated exhibited modulation in cyclin A index on tumor biopsy as defined by the study, defining the modulatory dose of IRN as 80 mg/m(2). Overall, 4/5 biopsies showed modulation. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during the first cycle of therapy. Two DLTs (Grade 3 nausea vomiting and dehydration; grade 3 pneumonia, hypoxia, hypotension) were seen at dose level 2 of capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2)/day) and the first cohort was expanded. There were no DLTs for patients treated at DL 1. No grade 3-4 toxicities occurred at DL 1. Seven patients were evaluable for response following one cycle of treatment (partial response 1, stable disease 4, progressive disease 2) Of the five inevaluable patients, two experienced DLT, one received 50% of the planned capecitabine dose, one progressed prior to evaluation, and one withdrew consent. CONCLUSION: IRN 80 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 22, 29 in combination with capecitabine 1,500 mg/m(2)/day in divided dose days 2-15 and 23-36 has an acceptable toxicity profile and resulted in modulation of S-phase in 4/5 specimens examined. Further studies of the activity of this combination and modulatory effect of IRN are warranted.

Share This

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark, ggundgaard@hotmail.com.

BACKGROUND: The past years’ therapy for colorectal cancer has evolved rapidly with the introduction of novel cytotoxic agents such as irinotecan, capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Further advances have been achieved with the integration of targeted agents such as bevacizumab, cetuximab and recently, panitumumab. As a result, third-line treatment is now a necessary step in the optimal treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a literature review of English language publications on third-line therapy for MCRC from January 2000 to April 2007. Data on median overall survival (mOS), median time to progression (mTTP) and response rate were recorded. RESULTS: We found 27 articles and 22 abstracts to fulfil the criteria. Patients who received regimens containing oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) demonstrated mTTP up to 7 months and a mOS of 16 months. With irinotecan and 5-FU, mOS around 8 months were reported and with cetuximab combined with irinotecan, the highest mOS was 9.8 months. CONCLUSION: Third-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer may improve mOS for patients with MCRC. Therefore, randomized studies should be conducted in the future.

PMID: 17786445 [PubMed - in process]

Share This