June 19, 2008
mesothelioma
No Comments
Pneumologie, Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées Percy, 101 avenue Henri Barbusse, 92140 Clamart, France. j.margery@free.fr
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains an aggressive tumour, but medical interest has recently evolved from almost nihilism to a real interest. Significant advances are observed in the pathologic diagnosis, the staging, the knowledge of the mesothelial carcinogenesis, the identification of biological markers with potential interest in diagnosis or in treatment. Proper management implies the participation of the general population since the implementation of administrative procedures for social and economical compensation. Active and multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies are currently evaluated and the concept of multimodality treatment includes new effective chemotherapies improving survival and quality of life, modern modalities of radiotherapy and pleuropneumonectomy. This advances create hopes and interrogations because it is not currently know whether multimodality treatment will be the standard in MPM.
Share This
June 19, 2008
mesothelioma
No Comments
Dipartimento di medicina preventiva, ambientale e del lavoro, Fondazione IRCCS-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milano. Carolina.Mensi@unimi.it
The Lombardy Mesothelioma Register (LMR) collects all incident cases of Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) occurring since January 1, 2000 in residents of the Lombardy Region. For each “possible case” reported to the Registry by Lombardy hospitals, diagnosis is ascertained through examination of clinical records (including histology reports) according to ISPESL Guidelines. For confirmed cases, a standardized questionnaire is administered to the subject or next-of-kin in order to verify the possible sources of asbestos exposure in his/her lifetime. A panel composed of industrial hygienists, occupational health physicians and occupational epidemiologists evaluate asbestos exposure in the workplace and environmental settings. Case ascertainment completeness is routinely verified using other sources such as hospital discharge records and death certificates coded as 163 (ICD IX). In the period 2000-2004, 1563 cases were collected, of whom 887 have been evaluated: the diagnosis was confirmed for 626 (70.6%) 9 out of 887 evaluated cases. The age and gender standardized incidence rate for pleural mesothelioma in the Lombardy Region, in the year 2000 (the only one with completed data), was 2.4 (males 3.7; females 1.4) per 100,000 residents/year The 70.5% of certain and probable MM has an asbestos exposure, in particular the 64.5% of cases has an occupational exposure. The experience gathered over the years by the LMR has allowed to implement an efficient information network among different institutions and health services. In addition practical skills have been gained in processing epidemiological data, a useful tool to address new scientific hypothesis and to plan ad-hoc researches. In our experience the LMR represents a potential resource transferable to the epidemiological surveillance of different occupational tumours (i.e. sino-nasal cancers).
Share This
June 19, 2008
mesothelioma
No Comments
New York University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, 550 First Avenue, NBV-15N1, New York, NY 10016, USA. kaufma01@med.nyu.edu
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but lethal cancer associated with asbestos exposure. Worldwide, the incidence of MPM is expected to increase over the next 20 years. The molecular and genetic profiling of MPM tumors and patients, and improved understanding of the pathogenesis of MPM may lead to novel diagnostic, preventative and therapeutic strategies. Treatment options for MPM remain limited and no consensus exists at this time. Multimodality therapy that combines surgery, chemotherapy and radiation offers the best chance for long-term survival in select patients.
Share This
June 19, 2008
mesothelioma
No Comments
Department of Cardiology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland AB25 2ZN, United Kingdom. g.small@abdn.ac.uk
Pericardial diseases can be difficult to differentiate from myocardial conditions. Diagnosis can be challenging and often requires the use of different imaging modalities. Here, we describe a case which presented with common cardiac symptoms which were shown to be the result of a rare condition. A 62-year-old lady presented with left femoral artery embolism. Post-embolectomy she developed cardiac failure. Three months previously an acellular, sterile pericardial effusion had been drained. In 1993 a left mastectomy and axillary node clearance was performed for breast cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were administered. Examination revealed a raised jugular venous pressure (JVP) with rapid Y descent and Kussmaul’s sign. CT chest and abdomen found no recurrence of breast carcinoma. Cardiac MRI demonstrated thickened pericardium. At cardiac catheterisation haemodynamic responses consistent with constrictive pericarditis were seen. Pericardiectomy was performed. Histology revealed pericardial epithelioid malignant mesothelioma. 18-FDG-PET CT post-operatively was negative in the pericardium and pleura. Chemotherapy with pemetrexed and carboplatin was given. The patient died 9 months after presentation. Radiotherapy and asbestos exposure are both associated with pericardial mesothelioma and the aetiology in this case was not clear. The condition carries a poor prognosis and is invariable fatal although newer chemotherapeutic regimens have prolonged survival times.
Share This
June 19, 2008
mesothelioma
No Comments
Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway; Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Trondheim, Norway.
Soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) in serum is potentially a sensitive marker of malignant mesothelioma (MM) diagnosis and progression, and may be useful as screening marker. Mesothelin expression in tumors is regarded as a sensitive marker for diagnosis and disease progression, and is a candidate prognostic marker. Levels of SMRP, CA125 and CYFRA 21-1 in pre-diagnostic (1-30 years) serum samples from 47 mesothelioma cases and 141 matched controls were analysed. Mesothelin expression in tumors was assessed. The association between biomarker level and mesothelioma risk and survival was analysed, adjusting for asbestos exposure. Survival related to tumor mesothelin expression, age, sex, histological type, location, asbestos exposure and pre-clinical SMRP was analysed. There was no significant association between biomarker levels and mesothelioma risk when analysed as continuous variables or as tertiles. Biomarker levels <10, 10-19 and >/=20 years before diagnosis were not significantly associated to mesothelioma risk. Mesothelin expressed in >50% of tumor cells was seen in 36 of 47 (77%) tumors. Mesothelin expression in <50% of tumor cells was a significant negative prognostic marker in all cases of malignant mesothelioma (median survival=6 months vs. 12 months, hazard ratio (HR)=2.49, 95%CI 1.17-5.27), and also when only epithelial mesothelioma was analysed (median=6 months vs. 14 months, HR=2.36, 95%CI 1.07-5.22). When adjusted for age and gender, the prognosis was still dismal, but non-significant (HR=1.85, 95%CI 0.85-4.05). High age (>65 years) was an independent negative prognostic factor that was related to both mesothelin expression and asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma of the epithelial type of the peritoneum had a significantly longer survival than epithelial type in pleura and was also related to mesothelin expression.
Share This