Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Megakaryocyte potentiating factor as a tumor marker of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Evaluation in comparison with mesothelin.

mesothelin, tumor marker, Megakaryocyte potentiating factor, malignant pleural mesothelioma No Comments

 

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy, and Rheumatic Diseases, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; Laboratory for Immune Signal, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, 7-6-8 Saito-Asagi, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan.

PURPOSE: An early and reliable blood test is one deficiency in diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF) and mesothelin variants (MSLN), members of the mesothelin gene family, have been studied as candidate serum markers for MPM. We developed a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system to compare the diagnostic efficacy of MPF and MSLN in MPM and control groups. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: MPF and MSLN were assayed with ELISA in 27 consecutive MPM patients and 129 controls including patients with lung cancer and asymptomatic asbestos-exposed subjects. RESULTS: Statistically significant elevation of serum MPF and MSLN levels was noted in MPM patients in comparison with every control group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for differentiation of MPM and lung cancer, healthy asbestos-exposed subjects, and healthy adults. While the AUC for serum MPF was 0.879, cut-off=19.1ng/ml (sensitivity=74.1%, specificity=90.4%), the AUC for serum MSLN was 0.713, cut-off=93.5ng/ml (sensitivity=59.3%, specificity=86.2%). Comparison between AUC for MPF and MSLN values shows that MPF is significantly superior to MSLN (p=0.025). Finally, there was a significant correlation between MPF and MSLN values for MPM (Pearson’s correlation coefficient=0.77; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that diagnostic value of MPF for MPM was better than that of MSLN although both markers showed almost equal specificity for MPM.

Biomarkers for asbestos cancer prevention and early diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

malignant pleural mesothelioma, diagnosis of mesothelioma, mesothelioma cancer, early diagnosis, asbestos cancer prevention, Asbestos cancer, Asbestos, Biomarkers for asbestos cancer, biomarkers No Comments

 Asbestos cancer

Università Politecnica delle Marche, Dipartimento di Patologia Molecolare e Terapie Innovative, Clinica di Medicina del Lavoro, Tronto 10/a, 0020 Torrette, AN. m.amati@univpm.it

Improved detection methods for diagnosis of asymptomatic malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are essential for an early and reliable detection and treatment of this disease. Thus, focus has been on finding tumour markers in the blood. 94 asbestos-exposed subjects, 22 patients with MM, and 54 healthy subjects were recruited for evaluation of the significance of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxy-guanosine (80HdG) in white blood cells and plasma concentrations of soluble mesothelin-related peptides (SMRPs), angiogenic factors (PDGFbeta, HGF, bFGF, VEGFbeta), and matrix proteases (MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2) for potential early detection of MM. The area under ROC curves (AUC) indicates that 80HdG levels can discriminate asbestos-exposed subjects from controls but not from MPM patients. Significant AUC values were found for SMRP discriminating asbestos-exposed subjects from MPM patients but not from controls. VEGFbeta can significantly differentiate asbestos-exposed subjects from control and cancer groups. No diagnostic value was observed for MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2. The sensitivity and specificity results of markers were calculated at defined cut-offs. The combination of 80HdG, VEGFbeta and SMRPs best distinguished the individual groups, suggesting a potential indicator of early and advanced MPM cancers. The combination of blood biomarkers and radiographic findings could be used to stratify the risk of mesothelioma in asbestos-exposed populations.